Staking APY is misleading

How does Nova Wallet get to 8.78% APY for Polkadot staking when both my calculations and @Leemo show the actual yield is below 3%?

Am I staking the wrong DOT, or is the advertised APY just a work of fiction?

I’d appreciate an explanation of how that 8.78% is calculated.

What’s even more amusing is that AH is showing an estimated return of over 18%.

Are these APYs generated by a random number generator, or is anyone actually steering the ship?

See here:

Looks like you have everything under control. :clap: :clap:

Do you know how to create a referendum to chill/remove bad actors from the active validator set? It seems that W3F or Parity are not willing to take action on this.

I imagine it’s something like this, but I haven’t really checked.

Fill this with a list of validators, where the “signed” bit is the validator accounts.

Then do this:

Then, probably this with the preimage hash:

Probably requires Root, might work on staking admin, but not sure.

I’d imagine you can ask some AI coding tool or something :man_shrugging:

Thanks. However, my understanding is that simply chilling a validator isn’t a permanent solution.

If a validator still has enough backing (self-stake + nominations), then chilling them only removes them temporarily, they can simply become active again once they choose to resume validating.

As far as I understand, the only way to prevent this permanently would be through a runtime change that allows governance to remove or restrict their backing. It also makes me wonder why W3F and Parity don’t seem interested in helping remove validators with a documented history of abusive behavior from the active set.

Is my understanding correct?