Note: the following is part of an emergent grass-roots development process, that you’re witnessing/enduring. Apologies for all the mess.
Background
There has been a steady, but accelerating move towards rethinking treasury financing (see @agyle’s Incentive Pools) and various stake/cashflow models but none focus directly on driving direct demand for the essential resource being offered by the protocols and therefore will all continue to have minimal / detrimental effects on the basic incentive design of Kusama/Polkadot.
Coretime focus
With the arrival of the more focused product of coretime NFTs, we have the opportunity to collectively unlearn a bunch of stuff and focus ecosystem resources towards more effective models for driving adoption, awareness and impact across every aspect of ecosystem convention.
Status quo: Project bounties aka domain based treasury strategy
Currently individuals or teams present proposals to the common good treasury in the form of bounties that pay out with relatively subjective deliverables or against KPIs unrelated or detached from the essential resources provisioned by the network - namely coretime.
Organisation
Individual off-chain teams structured around a project or within subjectively defined domains e.g. infrastructure, marketing, research, user interfaces.
Funding
Money cashflows experiments and there is no expectation of return. Risk falls heavily on all involved.
Design
Effort and resources are external to the protocol resulting in scattergun targeting, low conversions, high cost, lots of duplicated effort and often capital flowing to incumbent data monopolies.
Results: depletion of shared resources, popularity contests, degradation of culture, loss of talent, people are busy (burned out) but not effective, limited financial upside and often downside.
Impact
impossible to objectively define, assess and reward in a generalisable way.
Future facing: Coretime bounties aka direction based treasury strategy
By identifying coretime demand as the primary benchmark for assessing spending effectiveness we can rethink treasury financing, project development and organisational structures from the ground up.
Organisation
Anti-disciplinary (full stack) on-chain collectives partnering ecosystem native talent with external creators and patrons organised optimistically via pure proxies to deliver coretime impact and sharing in upside together.
Funding
Money advanced (like a record deal) and recouped against income generated by coretime collectives.
Design
Effort and resources are driven into the protocol resulting in more focused targeting, higher conversions, lower costs and capital staying within the emerging economy as it is recouped from successful experiments.
See YouTube’s 2012 ‘Original’s initiative’ where they advanced funding to creators and recouped against advertising revenues. It was a huge PR, awareness and adoption success that was followed by a second year incubator.
Results: conservation (and expansion) of shared resources, meritocratic contests, elevates culture, recruits talent, people work smarter, opportunity for large financial upside, downside capped with treasury taking risk.
Impact
Possible to objectively define, assess and reward in a generalisable way.
Summary
By establishing the essential purpose of common good treasuries as Coretime Bounties, we can begin to better design, develop and evaluate impact based proposals whilst encouraging collaboration between existing ecoystem contributors and external talent that can create positive rather than zero sum games.
Notes
Related work with Introducing an alternative financing strategy, structure and partnership for maximising the potency of Kusama’s treasury