Generally disagree. It is a fact that pure democratic voting does not lead to better outcomes.
Groups who are aligned with the interests of Polkadot, and have understanding of what is going on in Polkadot will often make better choices than individuals.
DV Cohort 3 was focused on giving voting power to DAOs, which are already decentralized groups, and I think this initiative is overall good.
Generally agree. We should create some games / incentives around participation.
This is not Sybil resistant.
This is not Sybil resistant.
Learn more: Quadratic Voting for Polkadot Governance
You need to expand here. Can’t see how things can be much more transparent than it is. We probably have the most transparent decision making process of any blockchain ecosystem.
yes definitely.
It is cheap to write down ideas, but hard to implement them.
So the question is: what are you willing to do to help with these things?