Hey All,
I wanted to re-visit a previous topic
https://forum.polkadot.network/t/paradigm-shift-in-governance-and-funding/4382
While the tactical aspects of the proposal would no longer be applicable I believe the strategy is. Further, we now have a significantly better tactical ability to execute the strategy. @giotto loves airdrops. And what can I say, people like free things (albeit not technically free since we fund many items via the Treasury).
With the emergence of Polimec, I no longer see why Polkadot can’t fund projects (acting as a VC of sorts) using our Treasury. Instead of asking for airdrops we consider the following:
-
Polimec does KYB so we know the folks we are interacting with have been cleared.
-
Polkadot sets up a collective of experts to vet investments (they KYC). Those folks get paid a salary and a percent of the tokens they invest in. They are now incentivized to pick good investments.
-
Those folks get allocated a monthly, quarterly, or annual budget (so not a free for all). They can be removed at any time based on a governance vote.
-
Projects get funded.
-
Token holders accrue the benefits of funding projects (substitute for airdrops). These tokens accrue to the Treasury.
-
Polimec also wins.
And as always, someone probably needs to confirm with a Lawyer