Decentralized Social Media


This is a proposal for managing Polkadot’s social media accounts. A new decentralized social media initiative for Polkadot would incorporate the strengths and agility of a structured marketing entity, while also creating a mechanism for the community to contribute in an organized way.

A hybrid model with two “branches” contributing content.

Day-to-day operations and “business-as-usual” content is handled by an Auxiliary that sits within a Marketing Coordination Layer (the agency, collective or coalition that will set Polkadot’s marketing strategy moving forward).

An Editorial Board of 7 members elected by the community, also may contribute content and strategy.

Decentralized Social Media

What does decentralized mean exactly?

This framework uses the definition provided by the Fellowship Manifesto:

“…a system which is decentralized in this way aims to systematically reduce the level of influence of any single participant in an effort to maximise the chances that the overall system performs as intended.”

This definition then prompts the question: how is it determined if the system (Polkadot social media, in this case) is performing as intended?

The answer relies on a defined intent, or purpose, of the Polkadot social media accounts.

The content shared across Polkadot’s social media accounts should:

  • Educate: Help new entrants to the Polkadot ecosystem (and the crypto-curious) understand what makes Polkadot the #1 network.

  • Inspire: Motivate VCs, entrepreneurs, devs, enterprises, crypto enthusiasts etc. to join the ecosystem.

  • Build Community: Nurture the community by offering a platform for engagement, discussion, and feedback.

  • Create Awareness: Capture mindshare by showcasing innovations, successes, partnerships etc.

  • Capture Insights and Feedback: Track sentiment, trends, community input.

  • Others: crisis management, thought leadership, networking, collaboration

  • ________: Would like to add something? Please leave a reply to this post.

“Reducing the Influence of Any Single Participant”

To fulfill the requirements of decentralization as defined above, the management of Polkadot’s social media accounts must transition from a single contributor (Parity) to multiple contributors, representing diverse voices from across the community.

This framework aims to give DOT holders a greater voice in shaping the direction of Polkadot’s social media.

The challenge is to do this in a way that is organized, so that Polkadot’s messaging is coherent and avoids looking like a signpost, with everyone clamoring about their project, token, conference, event, video etc.

If done incorrectly, a decentralized social media account may end up looking like a signpost…

A Hybrid Model

This framework borrows from the decentralization process discussed in “The Starfish and Spider.”

It is a hybrid model; it incorporates the strengths and agility of a structured marketing entity, while also creating a mechanism for the community and ecosystem to contribute to the social media accounts in an organized way.

The structure should not be overly complicated. On the spectrum of centralized-to-decentralized, the optimal point is where Polkadot finds the most advantageous position among competitors. Polkadot’s social media presence should be quick and responsive in order to compete with centralized actors, while also inviting the many talented Ecosystem Agents from across the community to contribute.

Founding Philosophies

No system will be perfect from the outset, so rather than try to engineer a system down to every last detail, it’s prudent to lay out guiding principles, which allow the system to evolve organically over time, so long as the principles are adhered to.

The proposed system shall:

  • Allow for community contribution. The system ultimately answers to the community of DOT holders.

  • Be agile in decision making, which is essential in the fast-paced world of social media. It should streamline processes, not complicate them.

  • Aim for content neutrality, every project in the ecosystem will have equal opportunity, however it’s reasonable to assume the projects with better user traction may end up getting more “airtime”.

  • Ensure a coherent marketing strategy by coordinating with other marketing entities in the ecosystem via the MARKETING COORDINATION LAYER (see definitions).

  • Coordinate with appropriate legal teams to limit existential risks to Polkadot, and avoid using language and imagery that may invite regulatory action.


  • Community: DOT holders

  • The Editorial Board (EB): A group that takes input from the COMMUNITY and works closely with the AUX and MARKETING COORDINATION LAYER. (In “The Starfish and the Spider” this is referred to as a “circle”)

    • EB may create content, manage a content bounty, and help guide the direction of Polkadot’s content, in coordination with MARKETING COLLECTIVE or AGENCY.
    • Composed of seven Editorial Board Members (EBMs), who are appointed in the first iteration, and eventually elected on-chain in PHASE 2. (Several members of the Technical Fellowship have confirmed such an on-chain election is possible).
    • Those wishing to join the board should fill out the EBM application.
  • Auxiliary (AUX): A person or group that supports the EDITORIAL BOARD and ensures the COUNCIL’s wishes are upheld. Akin to a “catalyst” in “The Starfish and the Spider.” Can also be thought of as a social media manager that sits within the MARKETING COORDINATION LAYER.

  • Marketing Coordination Layer (MCL): The larger marketing group responsible for Polkadot’s overall marketing strategy and narrative moving forward. TBD by W3F Decentralized Futures Program, but may exist as an agency, an on-chain collective, a coalition of guilds, or some combination of the aforementioned.

  • Ecosystem Agents: Individual contributors in the Polkadot Ecosystem. You know who you are :saluting_face:

A Node in a Wider Marketing Network

This framework does not propose to solve the question of Polkadot’s wider marketing structure/organization in the decentralized future.

Rather, this framework will “plug-in” to the MARKETING COORDINATION LAYER, that is to say, whatever wider marketing organization is adopted by the Web3 Foundation Decentralized Futures Program, whether that is a coalition of guilds, an agency, an on-chain marketing collective etc.

The social media function will coordinate closely with other marketing functions such as performance marketing, CRM, events etc.

The system would benefit from shared resources of content across various formats, as outlined in the Modular Marketing Materials concept. This would streamline content creation by the EDITORIAL BOARD, ensure consistency across all marketing functions, and would empower the COMMUNITY and ECOSYSTEM AGENTS to disseminate key messages.

The AUX and EB will coordinate with the body tasked with creating Polkadot’s overall marketing strategy.

One possible way marketing functions may coordinate in a decentralized future.


The framework is broken into two phases. Why phases?

Decentralization is a complex and transformative process, and cannot be done overnight. Segmenting the transition into manageable phases allows for careful evaluation and adjustment at each step, and ensures that any unforeseen challenges are addressed effectively.

PHASE 1 (approximately 6 months)

  • The AUX and MARKETING COORDINATION LAYER (MCL) create guidelines for the EDITORIAL BOARD (EB) to operate within.

  • The AUX helps set the plan in motion, and provides support to the ED.

  • The Editorial Board Members (EBMs) are appointed by Web3 Foundation.

  • The COMMUNITY can submit content ideas or completed content to the EB via a dedicated Channel (#ContentSubmission) on the Official Polkad Discord Server.

  • The EB may work with the community to curate content. For example, EBMs may work with Ecosystem Agents (EAs) or an Agency to create an educational thread on a technical subject.

    • The EB may decide to go to the Treasury to curate a content bounty.
  • The EBMs discuss content in a private Discord Channel, and vote (off-chain) to decide what to submit for publishing to the AUX.

  • The AUX and MCL manage day-to-day or “business-as-usual” content

  • The AUX and MCL approves content to be published.

  • The AUX and MCL may create content as well, and manage day-to-day or “business-as-usual” content such as announcements, event support, roundups, admin, reporting etc.


Phase 2 begins when the system proves it is able to create high quality content and able to operate without controversy, with the community’s approval.

  • The EB has direct publishing capabilities.

  • EB membership moving forward is decided on-chain in a staggered election, by DOT holders.

Content Created by Two Branches

An earlier version of this framework laid most of the responsibility for content on the EB; however after sharing the concept with several members of various parachains, it was decided to revise the framework so that the AUX is a dedicated, full-time role responsible for creating content in coordination with the marketing roles within the MCL. In other words, the concept was revised to be slightly less decentralized and more of a hybrid model to ensure consistency across all channels.

In this hybrid model, there are TWO “branches” creating content: the AUX which sits within the MCL, and the EB which operates in coordination with the MCL, but is editorially independent from it.

In this way, the EB can be viewed as the conduit through which the community’s content and voice is channeled into the social media accounts.

Content Flow:

Content may be created by either:

  • The AUX, working within the marketing guidelines created by the MCL and coordinating closely with the MCL.

  • The EB. Content is sourced, discussed, edited and voted upon in a Discord channel on the official Polkadot server.

    • In PHASE 1, approximately the first 6 months, the EB can draft content, but not publish, it must be approved by the AUX to ensure it meets quality standards and regulatory requirements. If the content meets both requirements, it should be published without delay.
  • After this system has proven to work without controversy, the EB will gain direct publishing rights.

Note: The diagram above does not represent on-chain decision making. Day-to-day operations of the social media account should be managed and decided off-chain due to the responsiveness necessary for a high functioning social media team.

Proposed Compensation for Board Members

All seven Board Members are expected to contribute, on average, at least 10 hours per week, and therefore should be compensated.

Suggested compensation = $X of Locked DOT per 6-month term, per board member, based on the EMA7 DOT price at time 00:01 UTC, on the first day of the 6-month term.

Initially the compensation should come from the DFP, and then sourced from the Treasury after the first 6 or 12 months.

EB Tenets

  • Above all, act in the best interest of Polkadot.

  • Be impartial and neutral, and not promote projects in which they have a financial or other interest above other or competing projects in the ecosystem.

  • Sincerely listen to feedback from community members.

  • Other tenets to be determined by LEADERSHIP, AUX, EB and COMMUNITY.

Staggered Elections

A staggered system is proposed.

Editorial Board Member (EBM) requirements

In PHASE 1, the W3F DFP committee appoints the 7-member board. Those interested in being an EBM should fill out the Application.

EBMs should be:

  • A prominent content creator in the community as determined by community consensus (in the voting PHASE 2)


  • A current or former member (within last 12 months) of:
    • Polkadot/Kusama parachain team or team building in the ecosystem
    • W3F or Parity
    • ChaosDAO, Kusama Society, or other recognized social organization in the ecosystem.


Ability to convene by video meeting for two hours, 2x per month, between 7:00 - 17:00 UTC

(Author suggests one member from the W3F on the first iteration of the EB.)

Agenda for first Editorial Board Meeting

  • AUX educates EBMs on legal and regulatory issues
  • EB adopts guidelines set by MCL
  • AUX ensures all EBMs have 2FA enabled on their personal Twitter accounts (Typefully uses Twitter SSO for access)
  • AUX shares invites for Typefully
  • AUX shares design asset folders, and audience personas with EBM

Tools and Subscriptions

  • The drafting and publishing of content will be facilitated by Typefully, a tool which allows for multiple users to draft content, and for users to have various draft/publish capabilities. ~$240 if billed annually.

  • SproutSocial (optional but suggested), industry leading social media management and analytic platform. ~$8,500 if billed annually for three users.

  • Adobe Creative Suite - $720 billed annually.


  • The ideas presented here are not intended to be final; but dynamic and open for discussion.

  • This framework does not intend to conflict or replace other marketing proposals. It is designed to complement and “plug-in” to whichever marketing group forms to lead Polkadot’s marketing efforts moving forward.


Honestly this is a great initiative. I’m excited to see how this hybrid approach can make content more intuitive while not sacrificing on the advantages of centralizing the editorial and content aspect.

I consider this extremely well researched and makes clear you are one of the clearest marketing process thinkers out there. I reread Starfish and the Spider at your (and @shawntabrizi ) recommendation, which on second read and in this context means so much more.

I was amazed that you didn’t include any appeal to the Jobs/Apple-ian style marketing that I know you see missing in today’s decentralized marketing initiatives, which leave the narrative, the human, the emotional connection somewhere else and while listing out ambitious goals, are basically bankrupt of actual vision of where we need to go.

So I wrote this to try to fill this hole with this “POLKADOT >> WEB3 BLOCKCHAINS”

Decentralized Futures/OpenGov: "Polkadot Does What Ethereum Cannot" 2024 Brand Marketing Campaign

This contemplates an Agency RFP Process, a suitable OpenGov bounty, and I would appreciate your help on developing this and I would nominate you as a curator of it. Would you kindly share your answers to the following:

  1. Can you share examples any executed public agency RFP processes from “Web3” ecosystems?
  2. Who would you want to invite to your RFP?
  3. What can we accomplish by April 1, June 1, September 1, December 1 in 2024?
  4. Can I count on you to be a curator? Who would you want to work with on this?
  5. Can you recommend a USD budget for 2024?

I do not have the needed experience but am super excited about working with people who want to see this process developed ASAP. We have the people, resources and ideas of what to do.

Thank you for sharing your proposal and leading the way!

I believe this approach could be effectively applied to decentralize the forum on Subsocial. You have the option to establish a PolkaVerse space named “Polkadot Forum,” with ownership managed through a multisig. Afterward, you can authorize individuals to post within that space. Users can share content and engage in discussions, utilizing the seamlessly integrated GrillChat. GrillChat operates on xSocial, an independent Substrate chain (ensuring swift and quick communication), while PolkaVerse operates on Subsocial Mainnet (slightly slower but more secure). Considering our overarching strategy of resilience and decentralization, it would be beneficial to explore and become early adopters of existing products within the Polkadot ecosystem, providing valuable feedback to enhance these products.

thank you Hutch!

Thanks for sharing @filippoweb3 :grin:

Very nice proposal, I like that it has concrete actions going to be taken and that is keeps the door open for collaboration and development.

Also I like the staggred election cycle since this forces/enables new blood in at a steady pace but it also is enough time for people who engage to feel it is long enough for them to get a chance to influence direction.

Overall it just seems well thought out and well made.

1 Like

thanks for your support!

Jobs/Apple-ian marketing

I can share the 100+ slide social media strategy presentation—which includes brand marketing ideas—with you privately.

2024 Brand Marketing Campaign

I will review and follow up with you.

1 Like

Thank you for your comment! Happy to hear you like the staggered election cycle. I think it’s a practical method for allowing fresh perspectives. The details (term lengths, term limits, voting frequency etc.) will be decided by the community, the ideas I proposed were meant to spark conversation about it.

Thank you for putting this together and sharing with the community @et90266.

Having seen the development of this initiative from aside, cannot stress enough how much research, thinking and discussion have gone into this proposal.

I believe that current decentralisation process requires this exact type of thinking to “glue” it all together. Fully support this initiative!

1 Like

@dgencitizen thank you for the support ser!

1 Like