Hello Polkadot Community,
For a while the community has noticed that monstrous rewards are requested by influencers or content creators.
Personally I share this opinion and find the amounts requested exhorbitant.
I therefore propose appropriate governance for this specific case.
The proposition is as follows:
create charts precisely setting the remuneration for work carried out. A max fixed part per type of job (technical popularization video, article in web3 journal, etc.) and a variable part indexed on elements such as the number of views, the notoriety of the person, a rating given by the community on the work ,…). So that all rewards are known by everyone before the begining of the work.
I think this proposition is fair and no surprise.
So that community decides on fix rewards (example an evaluation 8/10 give 80% of the fixed rewards) quality evaluation and for the variable (depends number of view fot example)
What do you think about that proposition?
Posts on the Polkadot Forum are not proposals–if you’d like to make a proposal, you will need to use OpenGov and issue the proposal on-chain, since Polkadot is governed by the community via on-chain governance.
I can build the abacus and the process with description of all activities but i’m not a dev, i’m a project director. So if community is interesting i can work on the need expression and specifications.