Why DeSci Isn’t on Polkadot (Yet) — And What We’re Doing About It

TL;DR

DeSci (Decentralized Science) is a movement to bring science into a new era: one that’s open, transparent, and collaborative. Polkadot has all the tools to make this vision real, but right now, not a single DeSci project exists in its ecosystem. We started OSRD to change that. If you care about the future of science, you can help.


What is DeSci?

Science is supposed to be a pursuit of truth—open to all, shared with all.

But today, most of it is locked away. Research papers sit behind paywalls. Data is hidden or lost. Funding favors prestige over potential. And collaboration is often limited by borders, institutions, or ego.

DeSci is a movement to fix that. It’s about using blockchain not just for finance but for the pursuit of knowledge. Imagine scientific data stored openly, research funded by communities, and discoveries credited fairly through immutable records. DeSci is a new way to do science—without the gatekeepers, without the silos.

This isn’t science fiction. It’s already happening. Projects are rethinking publishing, peer review, funding, and collaboration—using DAOs, tokens, decentralized storage, and on-chain governance. Slowly but surely, science is being reimagined.


Why Do We Need DeSci?

Because the current system is failing too many people.

A researcher spends months on a discovery—then waits another year to publish it, only for it to land behind a $40 paywall. A brilliant idea doesn’t get funded because it’s not coming from the “right” institution. A young scientist in a developing country can’t access the papers or tools needed to contribute.

This isn’t just unfair—it’s dangerous. We’re facing global challenges: pandemics, climate change, AI safety, and energy crises. We can’t afford a system that slows down innovation or shuts people out. We need a science that’s faster, fairer, and more global.

DeSci is not about replacing science. It’s about unlocking it.


Why Polkadot Is a Perfect Fit for DeSci

Polkadot isn’t just another blockchain. It’s an ecosystem built for complexity—just like science.

Where most blockchains are islands, Polkadot is a network of bridges. Its parachain structure means that different blockchains can talk to each other, share data, and collaborate without friction. This is exactly what science needs: interoperability. Imagine a research funding chain connecting directly to a data-sharing chain or a peer review DAO linking to a publishing protocol.

And it’s not just about connections—it’s about scale. Scientific data is massive, and Polkadot’s architecture allows for parallel processing across chains. That means no bottlenecks and no slowdowns.

Polkadot is also endlessly customizable. Using Substrate, developers can build blockchains tailored to specific scientific fields: one for genomics, one for climate models, one for clinical trials. This kind of precision is vital—science is not one-size-fits-all.

And because Polkadot offers shared security, teams can focus on innovation without reinventing the wheel. Add in on-chain governance and funding tools, and you’ve got the perfect toolbox for building science DAOs.

So yes, Polkadot was made for things just like DeSci. But here’s the paradox: DeSci is growing, and Polkadot is capable, yet they’re not growing together.


So… Why Is There No DeSci on Polkadot?

It’s not because it can’t happen. It’s because the right bridges haven’t been built—yet.

DeSci is still young. Many of the projects are in early stages, and in Web3, early projects tend to follow where the crowd is. Right now, that crowd is mostly on Ethereum. It’s the familiar ground, the well-lit path.

But Polkadot remains largely a mystery to DeSci builders. Many of them don’t know how it works or what it could offer their mission. It’s not that they’ve rejected it—it’s that no one has really shown them the door.

And to be fair, that door isn’t easy to open. Polkadot uses unique technologies like Substrate. It’s incredibly powerful—but that power comes with a learning curve. For a small DeSci team, learning a new stack can feel overwhelming.

There’s also a tooling gap. While other ecosystems now offer templates for launching science DAOs or publishing protocols, Polkadot doesn’t yet have plug-and-play DeSci infrastructure. Builders would have to start from scratch.

Another problem is that the DeSci and Polkadot communities rarely interact. They live in different spaces, attend different events, and read different things. Without bridges between the cultures, no one even knows who to talk to.

Then there’s funding. Most of the DeSci grants and VCs are Ethereum-centric. It’s not that they dislike Polkadot—it’s just not on their radar. This makes it harder for a founder to choose Polkadot, even if they want to.

Finally, there’s the perception problem. To an outsider, Polkadot can look complex, academic, and even intimidating. It’s not a fair view, but it’s a real one. We have to change the story if we want to change the momentum.


What Can We Do About It?

The good news? These aren’t hard limits. They’re just missing connections. And connections can be built.

We can make Polkadot more accessible to DeSci builders. We can write guides, tell stories, host conversations. We can build starter kits and no-code tools. We can connect funders with founders. We can shine a light where no one’s looking.

But most importantly, we can believe that Polkadot deserves a place in the future of science. And we can start acting like it.

This is why we created OSRD.


Who We Are

OSRD stands for Open Space for Research & Development.

We’re a small team—just two people—who believe deeply in the power of open science and the technology behind Polkadot.

We’re not a foundation. We’re not funded. We’re just driven.

We believe that if we start telling the story, if we start building the bridge, others will cross it.

What We’re Doing

We’re starting with education. We’re writing simple, clear content that helps people understand what DeSci is, why it matters, and how Polkadot can power it.

We’re publishing in-depth articles, creating Twitter threads, and hosting conversations with builders and researchers. We want to connect people who’ve never spoken before.

We’re shining a spotlight. We’re saying: “Look over here. This space is full of potential.”

Our Goal

By the end of 2025, we want to help at least 10 DeSci projects launch on Polkadot. Don’t just talk about it—do it. We want to guide, support, amplify, and celebrate the pioneers who take the leap.

Join Us

If you’re reading this, maybe you’re one of them.

Maybe you’re a researcher with a bold idea. A developer with a powerful tool. A dreamer who wants to make knowledge truly free.

You don’t need permission to build. You don’t need to wait for someone else to lead. This is your space, too.

Follow us:

Share this message. Join the conversation. Help us light the path.

Let’s build the future of science. Let’s do it on Polkadot. Let’s do it together.

8 Likes

Decentralisation cutting into every area of life!

Great one! The X link you provided says your account has been deleted!

1 Like

Hey there, it seems your X account has been deleted.

hey, @Mint and @BitBandit98, OSRD rebrand his name to @teamosrd.

New Profiles

1 Like

Great topic. Do you have ongoing projects already? Would be happy to research this idea further.

I did a presentation last year locally on AI and Polkadot and I touched on @OriginTrail and DKG (Decentralized Knowledge Graph) being used for DeSCI with ID Theory. If you look at DKG you can see they’re working in this field and are blazing the trail! You may want to look into this as they’re a resource that is already in the space.

1 Like

Thanks for this @HopeClary, I was not aware of this.

Have you shared your presentation somewhere? Would be happy to watch it.

1 Like

@implabinash Are you connected to OSRD or involved in the Polkadot & Desci in any way? Would be open to have a quick chat.

I created a PowerPoint, but my actual presentation was live recorded by Sliver Logic in Boca Florida. I do not have the recording of me speaking. Since I put together my own PowerPoints I tend to speak freely with notes as a guide. The slide I think you want is 8 and it is called a SciGraph. I think this was the final version, as the notepad I used is gone. There are video’s embedded and a song a Dev wrote as well. Polkadot Deck Honest AI.pptx Let me know if I can assist further to connect these dots? I believe this topic is important and hope that AI also integrates wholistic medicine, a balance of east and west :crossed_fingers:

1 Like

Thanks for this @HopeClary,

Reviewed the slides. Yes, this is interesting. Obviously, I am more focused on the data side. Are you actively working on this (or some similar project)? Or, do you know anyone I should chat with?

Would like to understand the landscape better and the biggest data-related problems. At the moment, I am focusing on whether Polkadot is the right ecosystem for desci data integration and, if so, what are its benefits to other networks.

Would be happy to chat if you are open to it.

1 Like

Hi @nocibambi I would be happy to help and connect you to some people. OriginTrail is on Polkadot and the Decentralized Knowledge Graph is about data validation so AI will not hallucinate and to verify, it is why it is a great partner in for DeSci. They have tools for you to build what you need.

If I understand your needs better I should hopefully be able to connect you. DKGcon has many corporations using DKG, from AWS Amazon Neptune to James Brodie from ID Theory (DeSci slide), plus many, many more! My research has been independent on this topic, but I can probably work with you and connect you to people and what you need when I understand the scope of your project better. Please let me know how you would like to connect.

All the Best,

Hope

Dropping this here for you to start. Anything additional, I would assist in connecting as I am not sure the scope of your intention in DeSci, if you want to build infastructure on Polkadot, or use some of the tools already developed to flow outward? Revolutionizing healthcare - OriginTrail

Have you spoken to SciNet at all? They could easily be a parachain but it doesn’t look like they are

Bloxberg as a DeSci Case Study

Hey, I wanted to highlight an established project that represents exactly the kind of infrastructure you’re trying to attract: bloxberg.

AI generated summary:

What is bloxberg?

bloxberg is a global blockchain network operated exclusively by research institutions since 2019. Key facts:

  • Governance: Run by the Max Planck Digital Library and a consortium of 11+ research institutions across 9 countries

  • Current architecture: Permissioned Ethereum-based Layer 1 using Proof of Authority (AuRa consensus)

  • Planned transition: Moving to Ethereum Layer 2 (Arbitrum AnyTrust Rollup) with planned deployment in 2026

  • Use cases: Research data timestamping, certification, verification, IP protection

Their validator nodes are operated by publicly listed scientific organizations including:

  • Max Planck Society (Germany)

  • ETH Zürich (Switzerland)

  • Carnegie Mellon University (USA)

  • Georgia Institute of Technology (USA)

  • University College London (UK)

  • IT University of Copenhagen (Denmark)

Technical Implementation

From their GitHub repos, bloxberg has developed:

  1. certify-app - Frontend application for research data certification

  2. certify - Smart contract for timestamping/certification (Solidity)

  3. peer-review-app - Peer review application (appears to be a concept/prototype)

  4. bloxberg-org.github.io - Documentation site

  5. genesis - Genesis block configuration files

  6. cns - Contract Name Service (similar to ENS)

Why This Matters

bloxberg’s planned 2026 migration to Ethereum L2 presents a window to demonstrate Polkadot’s technical advantages for their specific requirements:

Their stated needs:

  • Data Availability Committees (DACs) operated by research institutions

  • Scientific governance over infrastructure

  • Scalability for large research datasets

  • Resource efficiency

  • Institutional control over validation

Polkadot’s technical fit:

  • Substrate allows custom blockchains purpose-built for scientific workflows

  • Shared security means institutions govern without maintaining full infrastructure burden

  • Native interoperability between research subsystems

  • Parallel processing for large scientific data

  • On-chain governance primitives designed for DAOs

The Migration Context

Their whitepaper explicitly states: “Running and maintaining a Layer 1 blockchain has become increasingly complex and expensive.” They’re moving to Arbitrum primarily for operational sustainability while maintaining scientific control through DACs.

This is precisely where Polkadot’s architecture provides an alternative: research institutions maintain governance authority while delegating security to the relay chain. The parachain model could address their stated concerns better than an L2 architecture.

Suggested Next Steps

I think this project can be considered for a closer look. bloxberg represents a mature DeSci implementation with real institutional backing and active development - exactly the type of established project that could validate Polkadot’s infrastructure for science. Their 2026 migration timeline creates a natural opportunity for technical dialogue before architectural decisions are finalized.

Links:

https://bloxberg.org/discover/blockchain/

2 Likes

Neat! 10 projects until the end of the year is ambitious, though. How are you funded? How would the projects be funded?

I worked on a few DeSci projects before joining Polkadot, including one leveraging Bloxberg, and know a thing or two about funding mechanisms on Polkadot, so happy to chat.