Lets be clear here -
The Kus is not responsible for DOTs price. That is a incorrect assertion and i would suggest you take responsibility for where you put your money.
Production does take time and effort - for this there is a cost. Polkadots requirements for ‘Kus’ type activity could be put out to market - this would help people benchmark pricing / value and invite competition.
IMO - I think production quality tends to be good (space monkeys is jewel in crown) and Jay, whatever you think of him, has qualities. I do think views are low though, and that is driven by wider crypto apathy and polkadots status (others are responsible for this) - as such i would not overly promote ‘over delivery’ if i was him.
Items such as kus graphs, gaming updates offer zero value to me and i suspect to others.
I’d like to see KUS step back from all open gov production/open dev and see this managed by web3 foundation with credible figures brought in to manage. The system needs serious overhaul and controls put in place - it is open gov that is driving you nuts I would suggest - its become too cosy for some and lacks challenge and rigour.
Tried to be balanced here. Please dont bother me with any emotional replies.