*I personally do not like people throwing accusations without proof. *
OP of this discussion opened this discussion with on-chain proof - the best proof there is.
*I also believe everyone has the right to present their case when accused of something and I find it positive that **Crane came forward and explained his side of the story.
Yes, Crane gave us the story - that is the problem.***
- OP opened the discussion with hard tangible facts
- Crane gave us a story
- Crane gave us no tangible proof - just a story that interprets the transactions and even that interpretation is probably illegal, and opens new questions.
- Jay concluded that it was āpoor accountingā - by taking the responsibility, it is inherently shown that the original post with proof was right to ask questions.
So again, what are you liking on that post? You actually believe Crane was within legal/moral boundries when acting as proxy transactor for Nova? What reason do you have to believe the story Crane told us?
nor do I agree with the shortcut you make when judging other people because they decided to like a given comment.
I dont remember judging anyone, simply asking questions, but on the topic of judging other people who are asking questions - have you watched yesterdays video from Jay?
Which I actually find contradictory, since you yourself are calling people to think for themselvesā¦
Yes it is a disclaimer directly communicating to readers, not to jump to conclusions and ask the right questions.