Hey @ChrawnnaCorp rat pack here. Watched your video. It was almost as good as the last season of Witcher.
To anyone who watched it, let me offer some rhetorical questions, just for your personal exercise:
- Did KUS actually answer any of the open questions directed towards his personal reporting?
- Why spend an hour talking about people who raise questions and 0 minutes spent on actual reporting, explanation of Cranes moves, and missing reports from MB?
- Would you say the video is within the definition of “deflecting”? Is deflecting actually a pattern of Kus, when things get rough?
- Would you say the video is within the definition of “propaganda” and not actual reporting? (Remember, KUS told us last week, he aint a reporter but propagandist and we are paying for propaganda).
And the cherry on top:
Why is Kus responding to a post that is touching Cranes financial transactions? What is the connection?
Kus, are you Cranes lawyer, representative or propagandist for your clique?
Distilling people’s responses on Marketing Bounty and Cranes financial “maneuvers” to a mere “DOT is low so people angry” is patronizing and to be honest insulting to wider polkadot community.
Having a camera and speaking into it doesn’t transform you into Freud or anyone relevant to judge what people are feeling. You are not in a position to redirect your own and Cranes shortcomings to “we have angry individuals because the price is low”.
People are disappointed and have questions, which you nor Crane still did not answer, yet when it comes to bagging monthly fees, there are no issues.
Here is the new set of questions:
-
Did Jeeper or Flez ask you anything that you would not ask in your past - on AAG, your own DAO or in any other capacity? How do you distill someones anger from a question?
-
Why do you refuse to answer open questions on the forum? Rat pack not good enough?
-
Why didn’t you read the answer provided by Crane in the video? Maybe because it is borderline illegal and ridiculous excuse for something else?
-
You speak about political violence and then go and make a video, on youtube where you put individuals on the spot, commenting their skills, hourly rate and god knows what, because that person asked a question? Is this not violence of the highest order? How are you better?
-
Do you think if someone does a website that you don’t like they are unfit to ask you where the money is going? How do you connect these two facts - like really, how does this go together in your own brain? Because for anyone else watching, we see no correlation or causation - just deflection.
-
Why take 1 hour of rambling outside of your professional scope if all the reports are clean and everything is ok? Objectively, if you would see a video like that from the other ecosystem, wouldn’t you think to yourself “guilty AF” ?
So bottom line is:
- Crane is doing proxy payments for random projects, yet he is paid from OpenGov to curate MB
- Kus is doing “proxy” defense, for Crane, yet he is paid from OpenGov to “objectively report” not do propaganda
- Questions that remain open speak more than 100 of your videos.
Think for yourself. Question authority.