Sorry for using AI, but I am a native Spanish speaker, so I need some help to express myself clearly in English.
Anyway, I see a lot of frustration and bitterness in your comments. It is obvious you took it personally because the community voted “NAY” on your proposals, not just once, but several times. But if you respond with emotion instead of facts, you lose all credibility. Objectivity matters.
Of course, some initiatives like Blast, the Kus and a few others are clearly expensive and should have gone through OpenGov from the beginning, instead of being decided behind closed doors by a small group of curators. That is a fair point.
However, in my opinion, most of your original analysis and the arguments you made in this thread are based on personal opinion, not objective reasoning. That risks creating a false sense of logic. What you think is rational is actually just your disappointment talking.
And let’s be honest: I’m already seeing people in OpenGov voting “AYE” out of loyalty or habit, just to win favor with the Web3 Foundation and position themselves for future rewards. Very “decentralized” indeed.