@alice_und_bob, thank you for your feedback and pointers. I am on a learning curve here (/me researches Pure Proxy Multisigs), and appreciate your help.
My vision is mass adoption of decentralised governance on Polkadot! Project teams are simply my straw person for the problem to solve first.
Maybe a Splitwise alternative supporting crypto as well as fiat expenses would be useful for web3 user house-mates, co-working, travel, pop-up cities, …. That might remove one barrier for people switching to web3. At the same time, it’s kind of an accounting tool, rather than something that could open up access to the capabilities of OpenGov.
My assumptions for considering project teams as the first group to address are:
- reachable – your response is evidence of that
- motivated to decentralise governance
- tolerant of imperfect UX, if functionality is good
- needs not met with existing tooling
While project teams are a small sector, they are apparently not as scarce as sociocracies . Likewise, voting pools may be a smaller sector as well (considered here).
I don’t mind if the first users are few-ish and don’t pay. If there is a clear need, there is potential to rapidly deliver actual value, and get fast feedback to inform improvement. Then address the next segment.
I am totally open to ideas about another segment to address first!