thanks for putting this report together @jeeper. super helpful given how many bounties there are to keep track of and how little time most of us have in a day 
i realize it avoids assessing execution quality on the work itself, but i can’t help but wonder… does anyone know if or when the marketing bounty plans to share performance reports for the projects they fund?
for example, the ~$345,000 nova blast sponsorship (tranche 1 of 3 planned) - how is it actually performing? it seems like something the community should be able to see before a tranche 2 is funded, especially with ref #1701 set to pass shortly, which aims to give bounties even more control while reducing reliance on opengov.
and with a >$16k/month administrative role in the marketing bounty, having these kinds of performance reports publicly shared in a timely way (with tangible metrics that matter, not just fluff) feels like a reasonable expectation.
not trying to be confrontational here, just genuinely want to make sure we’re setting up good network practices that help everyone make informed decisions and get the most out of treasury/bounty spend.