A Terrifying Truth: Does DOT’s Price Matter to Polkadot? Not at All

As someone who has accompanied the Polkadot community for over five years as a long-term DOT holder, I once believed DOT could become a great investment in my life. That’s why I kept holding it. But judging from its price chart, it’s clear that this expectation has failed.

So, does DOT’s price matter to Polkadot? The answer seems to be no—or more bluntly, DOT has no real value. There is no demand, no market, and the system is far from truly decentralized. Instead, it feels like a Web3 experiment controlled by a tiny group of elites. Over the years, many community members proposed valuable ideas that could have benefited Polkadot’s development, but unfortunately, most were rejected.

For a long time, Polkadot was criticized for its lack of marketing. The community eventually listened and invested heavily in marketing, yet the returns were minimal. Large amounts of DOT were spent—ironically becoming another force suppressing the price. The bigger issue, however, is the absence of demand. Without a killer application, users simply cannot see Polkadot’s value.

There are also severe concerns about corruption in marketing spending, but the community’s leadership seems to look the other way while the treasury continues to be drained. This makes me feel deeply pessimistic about Polkadot’s future, even though it is now pushing its ecosystem strategy. A flawed governance system naturally leads to flawed outcomes.

Polkadot’s focus on technology is not wrong—technology is its foundation and its soil. But when such “fertile soil” fails to produce meaningful fruit, one can’t help but question whether the technology is truly as advanced as advertised.

Some people say: “You can’t judge Polkadot only by its token price. Look at the tech and the ecosystem.” Fair enough—its technology and ecosystem have indeed made progress. But it has taken five years and enormous spending. We should reflect: is this level of efficiency acceptable?

For investors and users, Polkadot’s technology and ecosystem have not delivered tangible benefits. Meanwhile, DOT’s price keeps dropping, and the treasury continues to operate at a loss. By the time the treasury burns through its last DOT, the token’s price may already be close to zero. Perhaps the Polkadot community never cared about the price in the first place.

What they care about seems to be giving grand, detached speeches in academic circles—or figuring out how to drain the treasury of its remaining funds.

In the end, price doesn’t matter—because the value of a “shitcoin” has always been zero.

Just sell and take the haircut man… you’ll feel better…

Everybody here is disappointed in DOT’s price action. It’s a shame that the most innovative project in crypto has nothing to show for it’s investors. I have lost more than I care to admit.

Polkadot has been nonstop good ideas with terrible execution for years. And, it is a highly inflationary asset. What people failed to realize is that inflation is everything. People will not hold an asset that loses over 12% of it’s value annually. And people can’t make up for that with staking in high tax jurisdictions.

That store of value is the main reason people buy most cryptocurrencies right now. People aren’t buying thousands of dollars worth of ETH to pay their fees or buy things. People aren’t buying thousands of dollars of BTC to pay fees or buy things. DOT took away the primary reason that attracts holders of a token with a high inflationary model.

Atleast something is finally being done about it but it could be too little too late… people will always look back in the charts at polkadot’s old price point and view the current price with the inflated supply in a bad light.

Parity and Web3 Foundation have failed time and time again to make change on the one thing that drives sentiment which is price. It is nonstop negative feedback about lack of support for the parachain teams, issues w/ treasury, difficult development experiences, etc.

Not to mention, there have been no solutions to give the DOT token additional value. Polkadot Plaza never happened. People don’t build applications w/ DOT. Even if there was considerable demand in DOT coretime, it wouldn’t be a significant amount of DOT being purchased to fund development. The average person is not going to buy DOT for governance purposes. And you can no longer fund projects via auctions w/ the DOT token. It has basically become a utility token.

There has been no clear leadership in the space for so long. Purely democratic systems do not always work.

DOT is now ranked #29 on cmc, behind 28 other coins that are all technically inferior. And, we will continue to sink unless the community and leadership gets their shit together.

There ought to be some sort of rebranding and 2nd look marketing campaign once all the changes of 2026 are in.

1 Like