What's going on with aUSD moving with no transaction hash on Subscan?

I’ve been fixing accounting errors, and have found some stuff between Interlay, Astar, and Acala that’s a bit sketchy. Maybe, someone should figure out what is going on.

Around the aUSD error print there’s a bunch of tokens moving back and forth between Acala and Interlay with the label 1 token. As far as I can tell they’re all iBTC and INTR. If you do a search for the XCM transfers directly nothing pulls up for that transaction hash on Subscan. Here’s a list of them. I know they’re real transactions as I have INTR moving between both of those chains around that time.

On the Astar EVM there are swaps going on between tokens into aUSD / ASEED with no hash showing up for the transaction, on Polkatax. The transaction is not even found on Subscan. If you search your Ethereum address on Polkatax you’ll probably find some of these transactions early in Astar’s history. Anything around prior to 2023-03-23 will have them show up. Here’s a few example addresses with them:

  • 0x052e505865da56d3d30cf18b2Cf805D12dD22A70
  • 0x7DC7B25043983BBF7C30D45ffaf132C0C5F100A8
  • 0xb4FC7dF3F2Dc86c9820e48c1ecCc6a7446bd5C96

Considering there’s this code comment on Acala from prior to the aUSD error print. Starts getting real sketchy with whatever happened with that error print. Giotto’s people have also found some sketchy relations between Acala and others. It almost feels like there’s a conspiracy, and maybe who ever is responsible are also who hacked Parallel. All I know is there needs to be research into greater detail to figure out what’s going on on chain. Is anyone going to look into this stuff some more?