Serious Concerns About Proposed Spending on Encointer Infrastructure

Governance
1

I’m quite surprised to see Paradox pushing for additional infrastructure costs for Encointer, given its current level of activity and relevance. It raises serious questions about whether allocating resources in this direction is justified at this stage.

It is also important to consider potential conflicts of interest, as Paradox appears closely involved while strongly supporting this proposal. Greater transparency around this aspect would help the community better assess the situation.

There is very little time left to prevent this proposal from being approved and resources being allocated to a network with little to no activity. I strongly encourage everyone to review the proposal carefully and consider whether this is truly the best use of funds at this stage.

images
images1535×669 132 KB

2

It looks like Paradox and his bad-actor friends will benefit from this proposal passing, even if Encointer is already a dead chain.

images
images941×731 54.8 KB

3

It is also surprising ho some Encointer-linked contributors are actively voting in favor of sustaining the project, which raises questions about whether governance outcomes reflect actual network usage.

image
image1375×697 126 KB

Past on-chain interactions between these related wallets warrant further transparency to rule out any coordinated influence on voting.

Given the current state of the network, the community shoukd reconsider whether continued maintenance of Encointer is still justified.

Please consider voting against the proposal.