Polkadot Legal Bounty Update

Today we’re sharing the first community update for the Polkadot Legal Bounty. The goal of these updates is simple: keep the Polkadot community informed on how the bounty is being used to advance practical, open legal work for builders and contributors across the ecosystem.

In this post, we’ll briefly recap what’s been done so far, outline the workstreams currently in motion, and share what to expect next. You’ll also find ways to get involved, whether that’s proposing topics, pointing us to pain points you’re seeing in the wild, or contributing expertise.

Going forward, we’ll publish these updates on a quarterly basis to provide clear, consistent visibility into progress, decisions, and deliverables.

Finished and Current Bounty Activities

Administrative Work

We set up a Discord server exclusively for the Legal Bounty. This allows us to secure client-attorney privilege and keep the process operationally as effective as possible. Users accept the T&C, put in an onboarding request (which serves as a first filter), after onboarding accept a Mandate Agreement (to ensure privacy) and open a legal ticket. Further administrative work includes discussion among curators regarding setup/onboarding of projects or teams, and communication with those teams regarding past and ongoing legal requests.

Sample Case of a Crypto Foundation

The Legal Bounty was engaged by an ecosystem project to establish and implement the necessary legal framework as well as obtain the relevant approvals and rulings from the competent authorities. After assessing the available options, it was decided that a Swiss-based crypto foundation would be the optimal vehicle.

Our work included drafting incorporation and formation documents, as well as organisational guidelines. We also provided assistance with finding possible foundation council members, securing a domicile and an accountant, and liaising with the relevant authorities, notary public and the Foundation Supervision Authority. We have taken, and continue to take where ongoing, all the necessary steps and measures to secure the recognition and establishment of the structure as a non-profit crypto foundation, including ongoing coordination with the competent authorities.

We are also preparing comprehensive organisational guidelines for crypto foundations and drafting an informal supervisory request (“no-action” letter) to the financial market supervisory authority in connection with this request. In parallel, we are preparing an advanced tax ruling to seek confirmation that the foundation is classified as a non-profit crypto foundation, and the conditions for tax exemption. We are also assembling the application package for opening a bank account and coordinating the foundation’s onboarding with selected institutions. A preliminary draft of the tax ruling regarding token valuation was prepared. However, in this case it was not suitable and therefore this part was not further processed.

The resulting work product is designed to be reusable for comparable future matters. Subject to confidentiality constraints, we will make the relevant templates and distilled guidance available to other teams and projects in the Polkadot ecosystem, either as contract templates or via the wiki.

Polkadot Community Foundation

There is currently further need in the community for clarification regarding the PCF, specifically if (and if yes, how) Cayman law allows for the community to have better oversight powers and what ways there are to protect community-elected representatives from excessive personal liability. We provided an initial, 14-page document that outlines some of the key legal facts, including both analysis and recommendations for a possible implementation roadmap. We are currently trying to reconcile our opinion with Autonomous, the law firm managing the PCF, and define concrete next steps that would most benefit Polkadot for a fair price.

Templates and Legal Wiki

We have set up a wiki for templates that is restricted for onboarded ecosystem members via Discord, meaning that only members of the Polkadot community can access the documents. Available templates are:

  • Two NDAs, a one-way version and a mutual one
  • SAFT
  • General Employment Contract Template
  • General Freelancer Agreement Template

The latter two need country-specific modifications and serve as the base template for various jurisdictions.

Work on the Legal Wiki is progressing steadily, with the first entry expected to be published within the next four weeks. This initial contribution will serve as a practical guide, outlining the key steps involved in choosing the right jurisdiction and establishing the appropriate corporate structure for new projects.

Beyond the initial focus, the Legal Wiki is designed to become a broader knowledge base addressing recurring legal and strategic questions - not only for startups, but also for established companies. Future sections will cover topics such as the selection of a tax domicile, regulatory and licensing requirements, and intellectual property considerations.

Our aim is to build a clear, reliable, and evolving resource that helps organizations navigate complex legal frameworks and make informed decisions at every stage of their development.

We would like to encourage and are grateful for suggestions and topic requests from the community, as they help ensure that the Wiki reflects real needs and relevant issues faced by our users. Contributions and feedback are warmly welcomed, so that the content can continue to grow in a way that is practical, impactful and community driven.

In addition, there is always the possibility to discuss open questions individually and confidentially with us. Such communications are protected under attorney-client privilege, ensuring that specific or sensitive matters can be addressed and handled with the necessary discretion, care and professional confidentiality.

IP Strategy Pack

The Legal Bounty offers a comprehensive Intellectual Property Advisory Package designed to help startups and established projects protect and enhance their intangible assets within the Polkadot ecosystem. While often neglected in the early stages of a company given the associated costs, not having a proper IP strategy comes back to bite later and is much harder to fix then.

Our approach combines legal precision with commercial insight, ensuring that IP protection aligns with each project’s business goals, supports sustainable growth, and preserves long-term value across the network.

We begin by aligning IP priorities with a project’s strategic roadmap, focusing on upcoming product launches, key markets, and investment milestones. For startups, we help establish a clean and scalable IP foundation. For mature teams, we review and consolidate existing portfolios. Our initial assessment includes availability, and clearance checks for company and product names, trademarks, domains, and designs across relevant jurisdictions - resulting in a tailored filing and protection plan.

Once individual needs, relevant risks and opportunities have been identified, we assist with the entire registration process for national, EU, and international protection.

To support commercialisation, the Legal Bounty helps teams and projects refine brand, content, and technology licence agreements, collaboration terms, and co-branding frameworks.

Rather than conducting trademark monitoring through the Legal Bounty, we help teams and projects identify and engage trusted IT service providers offering continuous monitoring and alert systems. These tools send regular notifications of potential matches or infringements, enabling teams to maintain oversight and respond proactively.

Deliverables include an IP strategy memorandum, a clearance and filing report, a registration roadmap, and standard key contractual templates. This service is available in defined phases offering a transparent, high-quality IP framework that strengthens brand and technology protection across the Polkadot ecosystem, reduces legal risk, and positions intellectual property as a strategic asset supported by the Treasury for the benefit of the wider community.

Total Hours Worked

Currently, we are at 91 billable hours invested plus some flat rate spends related to the setup (e.g. monthly Discord server charges), coming out to a total of ca. CHF 26k (ca. USD $33k) or 10’904 DOT, plus 2’548 DOT vested over 6 months (total 13’452 DOT). This excludes curator work. Thus, despite the significant decline of the DOT 7d EMA since the original proposal, the Legal Bounty is expected to remain funded and operational at least through H1 2026 without any additional top-ups.

What’s Next for the Legal Bounty?

Besides these ecosystem projects, the Legal Bounty continues to be ready for future projects and support their founders and builders. Additionally, we expect further legal or regulatory questions with ecosystem-wide relevance, such as those regarding OpenGov. We also plan to expand the template library and legal wiki.

Core Corporate Formation

In this section, the goal in the medium term is to provide a “Quick Starter Pack” including documents for incorporation of various corporate structures (Ltd., LLC, Association, Foundation etc.) in various countries, and supplementary contract templates such as a Shareholder’s Agreement, a Founders’ Agreement, a Consulting/Independent Contractor Agreement, or an IP Assignment Agreement. To this, we will also provide jurisdiction-specific addons, for example for the US (SAFE, W-8/W-9, Reg S / Reg D) or the EU (MiCA, CASP terms, GDPR).

Polkadot-Specifics

We plan to supply templates such as:

  • Bounty Curator Agreement (KPIs, curator fees, termination)
  • OpenGov Delegate Agreement (scope across Tracks; reporting and conflict rules)
  • Treasury Grant Acceptance Agreement (on-chain payout, milestone proofs, clawback)

The goal here is to provide better legal certainty to community participants and protect from excessive personal liabilities wherever possible.

Product, Platform, and User-Facing Apps

There is a plethora of legal work that comes with every product launch – much of which, luckily, can be standardized rather easily and then only requires small adjustments for each specific case. In this category, we are planning to provide general templates for Terms of Use, Privacy Policy, Cookie Policy/Consent Banner, among others.

Final Words

We’re interested to hear all feedback – not only on the Bounty itself, but also regarding the structure of this report so that we can implement it in future editions.

Last but not least, if you have a legal question that might be eligible under the rules of the Legal Bounty, please feel free to get started by joining the Discord here: Polkadot Legal Bounty .

This is yet another example of misusing funds. We don’t need more Discord servers, admins, or extra overhead just to keep milking the treasury. If the goal is truly to help the ecosystem, simply create a “Legal” section in this forum where teams from the ecosystem can upload templates and share their experiences when setting up legal entities and let the community contribute directly. No need for inflated structures, unnecessary expenses and same friends as curators.

2 Likes

I’m also concerned that if we already struggle with accountability in other bounties, this one will be even worse. With NDAs involved, it becomes almost impossible for the community to verify anything, it’s the perfect excuse to avoid transparency.

Hello everyone,

We are incredibly impressed and excited to see this comprehensive legal framework for the Polkadot Legal Bounty. This initiative perfectly complements our efforts to build a robust bounty management framework, filling a crucial gap between technical implementation and the governance of our bounty system. We believe this work is absolutely vital for bringing much-needed legal accountability to the Polkadot ecosystem and all its ventures, which will undoubtedly propel us to new heights.

We’re particularly glad to see that proper channels of communication are being established. It’s a significant step forward. We do, however, feel strongly that instead of relying on platforms like Discord, a more robust, on-chain solution for various communications would be better suited for this initiative. Such a system would align more closely with Polkadot’s decentralized ethos, enhancing transparency and resilience for everyone involved.

Overall, we applaud and welcome this with open arms! This is a fantastic step towards a more secure and legally sound future for our ecosystem.

We wanted to share our perspective on the ongoing discussions regarding this Bounty. While we acknowledge that the bounty might have seen periods of dormancy, we truly feel that the team is now moving in a profoundly positive and essential direction.

It’s understandable that recent conversations around bounties might highlight the timeliness of this post, and we view this as a proactive response to the community’s desire for greater clarity and structure. This Legal Bounty represents a much-needed element in fostering the growth and ensuring the legal integrity of other bounties and projects within our ecosystem.

The idea of simply creating a “Legal” section on the forum, while well-intentioned for information sharing, cannot fully address the complex legal needs and structured support required for a thriving and legally sound ecosystem. The dedicated approach of this Legal Bounty, with its focus on standardized templates, professional guidance, and clear processes, is crucial for establishing robust legal foundations. This proactive work for future Bounty curators and contributors is setting an invaluable standard for how we collaboratively deal with legal aspects from a community perspective. It’s about building comprehensive, protective infrastructure, not just a repository of documents.

As we all work towards the best outcomes for the community and continue to build this incredible ecosystem together, we believe it’s vital for us to approach these discussions with a spirit of collaboration. Let’s focus on constructive engagement, taking emotions out of the equation so that our collective message is clear, actionable, and truly propels us forward.

We genuinely appreciate the significant time and effort being poured into this matter, and we look forward to seeing the positive impact it will have.

There have already been successful projects in the ecosystem that set up their legal frameworks without needing this bounty. Do you really think investors like Moonrock Capital, IOSG Ventures, NGC Ventures, Harbour Industrial Capital, and others don’t already have their own legal advisors for this? This bounty simply isn’t needed

Ok, I see your point. I do not agree.

Those are VC operations and yes they do have lawyers to set up things but not all projects are launched under a VC umbrella, and we do need the Common goods chains/ventures or small independent new ventures to be able to use some of this free tools. I think they do need this because they are working with their own capital or their friends money.

Agree, this bounty has been silence for a long while but they have put forward something of value in the legal front to help new ventures launch I will give then the benefit of the doubt, and keep my eyes on them in this regard.

Can we at least get an idea of how much of the time was spent on actual onboarded cases and how many onboarded cases are there as opposed to time creating the templates and wiki? also to know the impact on actual cases if this bounty were to be closed given it’s lengthy lethargy. Let’s revisit this, as documents needed for a Quick Starter Packs and knowledge bases (fenced) are usually not enough as you need to interact with the authorities or agencies to actually make it work.

For us, not much has changed since our initial closing post Closing Bounty 62. Polkadot Legal Bounty.

It wouldn’t make much sense to charge for little to no onboarded users. Moreover, this bounty seems like it won’t be able to explain much of the operations from a privacy / client-attorney point of view for obvious reasons. For OpenGov it’ll become extremely hard or impossible to attest the work done here as well.

1 Like