Hey everyone! I am linking this post to my proposal on the Starknet Community forum which discusses an idea on how the Polkadot tech stack can be reused in Ethereum. I wanted to repost it here for everyone to read it but as I am a new user I am only allowed one media file and 2 links per post. So …

It’s a truly interesting project – thank you for sharing! We’re curious, do you see it as a long-term solution or as an interim one until the generalized work processing model for Polkadot 2.0 stabilizes and gets implemented? Please correct any mistakes on our understanding– with the proposed work …

Hi @apoorvsadana ! We replied to Bruno in the other thread who helped to post your full proposal, linking the comment here: Bringing Polkadot Tech to Ethereum (Full Post) - #3

Thanks @sourabhniyogi and @sodazone for your comments. I am not sure if I understand the Polkadot 2.0 concern completely (sorry for my lack of knowledge here). From what I know, Polkadot 2.0 is the concept of having on demand core time on the relay chain which would essentially allow things similar …

Here you can find the RFC: polkadot-fellows/RFCs/blob/3d6859d030549d43615ec91613a766c50d391a3e/text/0031-corejam.md # RFC-0031: CoreJam | | | | --------------- | -------------…

This is indeed very interesting @sodazone . Building a shared sequencer on top of Polkadot has it’s own merit of being backed by billions of dollars in economic security. However, I feel this would also force the sequencer to follow Polkadot block times and other restrictions (if any) of the relay ch…

@apoorvsadana [image] bruno: While it’s true Polkadot did start building the multi-chain future way before Ethereum, there’s no denying that as of today, Ethereum is the most decentralised blockchain and the place where most of the apps and liquidity rests. However, what if there was a way to b…

@apoorvsadana After we got that out of the way, let’s get to the subject matter. I am super grateful that we are finally having the discussion of shared sequencers. However, I think that you are misunderstanding the nature of the relay chain. Relay Chain vs. Shared Sequencing Parachains follow a r…

[image] apoorvsadana: Also, @sourabhniyogi on your point of violation of the Polkadot Alliance, I am not sure how true that is. The way I look at it, Substrate has always been made in a chain agnostic way to allow anyone (linked or not linked to Polkadot) to build blockchains. If it so happens t…

Thanks @alice_und_bob for the thoughtful reply. Firstly, I do agree the future would involve multiple L1/L0 chains like Ethereum, Polkadot, Solana co existing with each other. Your insights on MEV are interesting and I will definitely have a deeper look at this. Relay Chain vs. Shared Sequencing Co…

I don’t really get the point here @sourabhniyogi . If it’s possible with engineering to have the shared sequencers on Polkadot (or maybe Kusama) with the same efficiency and promise as forking it, I don’t see why it won’t be done. It not only gives a very high economic security to the shared sequence…

Bringing Polkadot tech to Ethereum

Tech Talk

sodazone October 15, 2023, 9:20am 23

Related discussion: ZK Rollups as Parachains

Topic		Replies	Views
What are some differences between Substrate and Cosmos SDK? Miscellaneous	20	6794	February 20, 2023
Polkadot: The centralized decentralized ecosystem - a cartel? Ecosystem	18	2660	February 17, 2023
The state of DotSama Ecosystem	16	4172	October 21, 2022
ZK Rollups as Parachains Tech Talk	21	4511	June 3, 2023
Make Polkadot great again Ecosystem	14	2318	October 23, 2023

Bringing Polkadot tech to Ethereum

Related topics