Hi Everyone, I wanted to share some insights from a recent call where we discussed the current state of Asset Hub and Token Transfers and its impact on both DevEx and UX. Below are the notes from the call, along with the recording and some discussion points for further exploration. Context of the …

I want to expand on one of the topics: What: single asset can pay fees across the ecosystem If we want minimal-friction UX, more apps flexibility, and to maximize adoption across the ecosystem (not just Asset Hub), we need ubiquitous support for same single asset being able to pay for all fees on a…

[image] acatangiu: There is another thread discussing ability to completely use USDT/C for paying all fees on Asset Hub (on top of or as an alternative to already supported DOT): Sufficiency on assethub - #22 by joepetrowski The plan for Asset Hub is to use pallet-asset-conversion and allow JI…

Following up on the call we had last Wednesday, here are the notes: Foreign Assets Registration process Parity will enhance the documentation on how to create and use of foreign assets , this will also be added to the XCM cookbook . User stories @joyce will be collecting use cases that are currently…

@joyce I’d like to add a use case to your spreadsheet. from a non-dev perspective, I’m trying to create XCM calls in Polkadot.js for Parachain governance to control funds in their sibling accts on other chains, such as depositing treasury funds into the Omnipool. I expect to be able to pay XCM tran…

thanks @spazcoin , I gave you editor rights. As mentioned above: We currently can’t pay XCM delivery fees with any assets other than DOT/KSM, but non-XCM transaction fee payment works fine - here is the issue to it. This might be related, but we will have a look at the chopstick issue as well to …

Thanks for the detailed write-up @joyce ! [image] joyce: Hydra is asking for a XCMs call to facilitate the transfer, which will include multiple hops from Kusama to Hydra. Parity already has a solution for that which will be included in XCMv5. Do we have a main reference to follow the new fu…

hey @IkerParity , here is a meta issue linking to all changes that will be included in v5.

Summary of the AH user story outcomes We’ve got replies from 2 teams. 3 out of 9 cases are rather business related, than technical. The feedback shows that there’s a lack in documentation and awareness about the scope of features provided from the system. With that said, we will arrange a Webinar …

…and we’re excited to invite you to our upcoming Asset Hub and Bridge Hub Webinars! :tada: You will find an invitation to each webinar under this calendar link . The agenda and presenters are yet to be confirmed, so make sure to subscribe to the calendar in order to stay in the loop. In general, we …

Asset Hub Brainstorming Session - Call Notes and Discussion Continuation

Tech Talk

acatangiu April 22, 2024, 5:26pm 4

On a separate topic that was mentioned in the call: I just opened a thread discussing how the ecosystem should handle “the problem of multiple reserves” as evidenced by Asset Hub.

Topic		Replies	Views
AssetHub Vision Ecosystem	11	2009	April 22, 2024
Asset Hub Webinar Series Ecosystem	9	371	October 9, 2024
Expose builder-facing bridging components on Asset Hub Tech Talk bridge	7	2133	January 29, 2025
Permissioned pallet-contracts deployment to Asset Hub for DeFi primitives Ecosystem	18	2263	February 15, 2024
Discussion: Bridging assets via external bridges to different parachains via XCM Tech Talk xcm	19	3694	January 19, 2023

Asset Hub Brainstorming Session - Call Notes and Discussion Continuation

Related topics