I would add another win: [UXB-3] - Protective Measures for transfer to CEXs - #2 by ThomasR
I worked on it for months to improve wallets UI/UX and prevent users from being rug by design with the over complexity of XCM transfers from parachains to CEX for DOT/KSM.
So many users lost assets because it was not obvious in wallets that they couldn’t XCM from parachains to CEX directly (where most dapps prevented it cautiously).
How many assets lost? How many users that never returned to the ecosystem because of their loss? A lot.
I had recurrent cases to deal with doing Bifrost’s support, and I saw recurrent issues in wallets TG channels too.
And you know what, after wallets have changed their UI, adding warnings and adding controls, suddenly these cases dropped to zero… At least from my support perspective.
I didn’t have to deal with any new cases since.
That’s not something that advanced users noticed, but people doing support inside the eco won’t say it wasn’t a minor issue, it was a major reputation issue, the eco was seen from user’s perspective as scam network.
Cheers.