Clarification Request – Coretime Economics vs. Current Parachain Core Leasing

D0tSama
Fri, 23 May 2025 13:44:56 +0000
Tech Talk

Hi team,

I’m exploring the economics of JAM and Coretime, especially how DOT demand might scale when chains like Mythos (FIFA Rivals, Pudgy Party) move into the JAM model. I’m trying to reconcile two things:

Current Parachain Model (Relay Chain)

A chain leases a full core at a flat rate: 96 DOT per month per core

That’s ~1,152 DOT per year for one full-time core

There’s no metered or usage-based scaling — it’s flat rent regardless of actual usage

JAM Model Understanding (Requesting Confirmation)

My understanding is that under JAM:

Cores can be rented elastically by the second, not just month

Chains or agents can spin up/down multiple cores based on need

DOT is paid per unit of Coretime consumed, and a portion (e.g., 20%) is burned

This creates usage-based, scalable demand for DOT — more apps/agents/users = more DOT spent and burned

Projection Example (Wanting to Verify This Logic)

If FIFA Rivals brings 5 million users, and each user on average triggers just $10 of Coretime compute per year, that’s:

$50 million in total annual demand

At $5/DOT → 10 million DOT paid for Coretime

If 20% is burned → 2 million DOT burned annually

Key Questions

1. Is this a valid way to model JAM-era demand?
(i.e., based on user-driven compute spend rather than static core rents)

2. Is the 20% burn share still accurate in current economic discussions?

3. Will Mythos and similar chains eventually transition to this dynamic Coretime model vs. sticking to fixed slots?

Thanks in advance — just want to make sure I’m not blending the economics of the current relay model with what JAM will introduce.

Best regards,
DotSama

3 posts - 3 participants