# System Chains: The Same Bad Actors Again

**URL:** <https://forum.polkadot.network/t/system-chains-the-same-bad-actors-again/18667>\
**Category:** Governance\
**Created:** [September 15, 2026, 8:34pm UTC](https://forum.polkadot.network/t/system-chains-the-same-bad-actors-again/18667 "2026-09-15T20:34:39Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 2

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![ultracoconut](https://dub1.discourse-cdn.com/flex005/user_avatar/forum.polkadot.network/ultracoconut/32/5932_2.png) [@ultracoconut](https://forum.polkadot.network/u/ultracoconut)\
**Post date:** [September 17, 2026, 9:48am UTC](https://forum.polkadot.network/t/system-chains-the-same-bad-actors-again/18667/2 "2026-09-17T09:48:29Z")

</div>

I have a solution for that:

> [@Proposal: Unified Collator Pool for System Chains (64 Slots)](https://forum.polkadot.network/t/proposal-unified-collator-pool-for-system-chains-64-slots/18453):
>
> Short Description I propose unifying the collator infrastructure of Polkadot’s System Chains — Polkadot Hub, Bridge Hub, People, Collectives, etc. — into a single shared pool of 64 active operators. Instead of maintaining separate collator sets for each System Chain, all operators would be capable of supporting the entire System Chain ecosystem. The protocol could then dynamically assign block production responsibilities across the pool. The goal is to reduce infrastructure fragmentation, impr…

---

_[View the full topic](https://forum.polkadot.network/t/system-chains-the-same-bad-actors-again/18667)._