Thanks for the comments!
To sum it up, the important of topics seems to be:
- Omni Node
- EVM
- Testing
- LTS
@kianenigma is currently working on the Omni Node. AFAIK it will be extensible with a builder pattern, so it should be possible to do something like .with_custom_rpc(..) to add EVM RPC support.
The interest about EVM compatibility is a bit surprising to me, I think we currently dont put much focus on it. But thanks for the feedback.
About the SLO:
Yea its a good idea to define some. This would also help us reflect what worked out well and where we need to improve urgently.
I think the way to do this in a binding manner would be to create a Wish-For-Change track proposal and lay out the specification. That would basically mandate The Fellowship to do it.
Personally I have no experience with SLOs. @bkchr do you have an idea how to concretely move forward with this?