# Proposed Solutions for Unbricking an Enterprise Parachain with OpenGov

**URL:** <https://forum.polkadot.network/t/proposed-solutions-for-unbricking-an-enterprise-parachain-with-opengov/3796>\
**Category:** Ecosystem\
**Created:** [August 28, 2023, 6:53pm UTC](https://forum.polkadot.network/t/proposed-solutions-for-unbricking-an-enterprise-parachain-with-opengov/3796 "2023-08-28T18:53:10Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 12

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![joepetrowski](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/j/2acd7d/32.png) [@joepetrowski](https://forum.polkadot.network/u/joepetrowski)\
**Post date:** [September 5, 2023, 6:03am UTC](https://forum.polkadot.network/t/proposed-solutions-for-unbricking-an-enterprise-parachain-with-opengov/3796/12 "2023-09-05T06:03:28Z")

</div>

I agree also that some “Parachain Technical Fellowship” would be good for this role (as well as [others](https://forum.polkadot.network/t/collective-based-multi-asset-treasuries/2899)).

Parachains would probably want their local governance track that would lock their parachain to be shorter than the collective’s track to re-set code/head data, since the same power that can unbrick a parachain can also brick one. Then, if the para is “alive” and sees a referendum come up regarding itself, it can lock itself to prevent the substitution.

---

_[View the full topic](https://forum.polkadot.network/t/proposed-solutions-for-unbricking-an-enterprise-parachain-with-opengov/3796)._