# Polkadot NFT Collective

**URL:** <https://forum.polkadot.network/t/polkadot-nft-collective/4983>\
**Category:** Ecosystem\
**Tags:** nft, decentralized-future\
**Created:** [November 29, 2023, 10:51am UTC](https://forum.polkadot.network/t/polkadot-nft-collective/4983 "2023-11-29T10:51:10Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 5

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![sourabhniyogi](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/35a633/32.png) [@sourabhniyogi](https://forum.polkadot.network/u/sourabhniyogi)\
**Post date:** [November 29, 2023, 2:30pm UTC](https://forum.polkadot.network/t/polkadot-nft-collective/4983/5 "2023-11-29T14:30:18Z")

</div>

I think this initiative to should be focussed on _useful_ NFTs.

The most useful NFT in the ecosystem is CoreTime. Maybe there will be others that deserve similar attention, but its the only NFT that I care about. If you care about others, fine, but the CoreTime one needs additional help and those others will do just fine so long as people care about them.

In particular, this NFT supports the possibility of building secondary markets to make resource allocation more efficient.

**The value of DOT will increase with the construction of this secondary market.**

Do you think you could focus on this _one_ NFT central to Polkadot 2.0’s future? See Lastik for one company doing this, thus far.

Also, I don’t think anyone has a monopoly on the word “Collective”, but I’m hoping the word “Collective” in the ecosystem is tied to the [Collectives system chain](https://forum.polkadot.network/t/collective-based-multi-asset-treasuries/2899) or a parachain using the same pallets. Maybe use “Coalition” instead?

---

_[View the full topic](https://forum.polkadot.network/t/polkadot-nft-collective/4983)._