# Permissioned pallet-contracts deployment to Asset Hub for DeFi primitives **URL:** \ **Category:** Ecosystem\ **Created:** [September 13, 2023, 6:28pm UTC](https://forum.polkadot.network/t/permissioned-pallet-contracts-deployment-to-asset-hub-for-defi-primitives/3908 "2023-09-13T18:28:14Z")\ **Posts on this page:** 1\ **Showing post:** 17
**Author:** ![sourabhniyogi](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/35a633/32.png) [@sourabhniyogi](https://forum.polkadot.network/u/sourabhniyogi)\ **Post date:** [January 15, 2024, 10:38pm UTC](https://forum.polkadot.network/t/permissioned-pallet-contracts-deployment-to-asset-hub-for-defi-primitives/3908/17 "2024-01-15T22:38:05Z")
> [@joepetrowski](#): > > For interactions that absolutely must be synchronous and must be on AH, then we could explore the idea of hybrid blockspace where we set aside say 10% of the blockspace for contract execution. If there is a lot of demand for this tranche of blockspace, then the gas price will increase a lot, motivating contract developers to migrate to a contract chain or rethink their application architecture to work asynchronously. @joepetrowski Thank you again for lowering the ED and treating RFC #62 with high priority. Here is a different RFC #66: [Add EVM+ink! Contracts Pallets to Asset Hub for Polkadot by sourabhniyogi · Pull Request #66 · polkadot-fellows/RFCs · GitHub](https://github.com/polkadot-fellows/RFCs/pull/66) This is not just about defi+NFTs but also about enabling a new class of customer – [Polkadot Rollups](https://forum.polkadot.network/t/polkadot-da-vs-competition/3403) from [Blobchains on Polkadot and Kusama](https://github.com/thrumdev/blobs) and prepping AssetHub for [Coreplay](https://forum.polkadot.network/t/announcing-polkavm-a-new-risc-v-based-vm-for-smart-contracts-and-possibly-more/3811/68). Can I get you and the Polkadot Fellows to critique it? --- _[View the full topic](https://forum.polkadot.network/t/permissioned-pallet-contracts-deployment-to-asset-hub-for-defi-primitives/3908)._