# Parachain Technical Summit - Next Steps **URL:** https://forum.polkadot.network/t/parachain-technical-summit-next-steps/51 **Category:** Tech Talk **Tags:** frame, polkadot-summit, roadmap **Created:** [August 15, 2022, 2:01pm UTC](https://forum.polkadot.network/t/parachain-technical-summit-next-steps/51 "2022-08-15T14:01:18Z") **Posts on this page:** 1 **Showing post:** 14
### Author: ![gavofyork](https://dub1.discourse-cdn.com/flex005/user_avatar/forum.polkadot.network/gavofyork/32/189_2.png) [@gavofyork](https://forum.polkadot.network/u/gavofyork) #### Post date: [September 15, 2022, 8:31am UTC](https://forum.polkadot.network/t/parachain-technical-summit-next-steps/51/14 "2022-09-15T08:31:24Z")
On point 3, I have been using _pure proxy_ for the last year or two when referring to “anonymous proxy”. I think this is better than keyless proxy, since even regular proxies may be “keyless” - the difference with a pure proxy to a regular proxy is the lack of an _owning account_ (which may or may not be based on authentication through a keypair). Furthermore the code you reference simply states that pure proxies may not have the deposit returned - regular proxies always get their deposit returned. This is because pure proxies are not created through a deposit since there is by design no owner who could have their funds returned to them. --- _[View the full topic](https://forum.polkadot.network/t/parachain-technical-summit-next-steps/51)._