Neither would this fix any byte code size or storage problems nor would it meaningfully increase throughput (and it would break the Gas model which you think is unsafe).
Even Vitalik suggests the EVM is a major bottleneck and that it should be taken out of the picture. But hey, what does this guy know.
Of course we face and acknowledge major challenges and problems with revive. But that per se neither implies our theoretical assumptions being unsound nor our benchmarks being flawed. There is no free lunch and we can and will make trade-offs to overcome obstacles.
I spent a lot of my time and energy here and in other forum threads, trying hard to build a constructive discussion. We are working really hard and in our best faith to deliver a comprehensive smart contract solution.
Yet you keep chiming in on tech talk forums painting bleak pictures by calling our solution not working in absolute terms, the most useless of all ideas, and inherently insecure. Your presented alternatives suffer from the same problems or much worse flaws. Paired with grave accusations of me being unprofessional, not thinking a for a single moment, and, ultimately, only being here to build ivory towers and boosting my ego. This is not very inspiring. I feel discouraged and deeply disappointed.