# Invitation to Critically Evaluate Core Time Pricing Model Framework

**URL:** <https://forum.polkadot.network/t/invitation-to-critically-evaluate-core-time-pricing-model-framework/13404>\
**Category:** Ecosystem\
**Created:** [June 17, 2025, 5:12pm UTC](https://forum.polkadot.network/t/invitation-to-critically-evaluate-core-time-pricing-model-framework/13404 "2025-06-17T17:12:31Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Page:** 2

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![labormedia](https://dub1.discourse-cdn.com/flex005/user_avatar/forum.polkadot.network/labormedia/32/2638_2.png) [@labormedia](https://forum.polkadot.network/u/labormedia)\
**Post date:** [June 30, 2025, 7:37pm UTC](https://forum.polkadot.network/t/invitation-to-critically-evaluate-core-time-pricing-model-framework/13404/22 "2025-06-30T19:37:57Z")

</div>

Thank you all for the valuable insights and ongoing engagement in this thread.

After incorporating extensive feedback and further refining the proposal, I’ve submitted a formal draft RFC outlining the **Decentralized Convex-Preference Coretime Market** model as a concrete alternative to RFC17. This new thread consolidates the theoretical framework, implementation structure, and proposed application path, especially focused on Polkadot/Kusama as a possible testbed.

📌 You can read and follow the updated RFC draft and discussion here:  
👉 [RFC: Decentralized Convex-Preference Coretime Market for Polkadot [Draft]](https://forum.polkadot.network/t/rfc-decentralized-convex-preference-coretime-market-for-polkadot-draft/13573)

I welcome continued critique and contributions there to push this model forward with clarity and community alignment. Thanks again for your engagement and insight!

[Previous page](https://forum.polkadot.network/t/invitation-to-critically-evaluate-core-time-pricing-model-framework/13404.md?page=1)